Social Justice and Social Order Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words

Social Justice and Social Order - strain ExampleThe majority sociological explorations of mass gloss, especially those undertaken within a Marxist or sarcastic theory standpoint, tend to be restricted in their cultural and political postulations. This cultural elitism also rests upon a position of high culture, needing discipline and simplicity which can only be acquired by the professional shrewd through years of withdrawal from everyday labor and daily realities. More significantly, an elitist criticism of mass culture presumes, not only the peculiarity between low and high culture, but also the accessibility of whatever general or complete set from which a position of critique can be sustained. attendant Alasdair MacIntyres reasonably influential study After Virtue (1981), argue that a rational system of value as the base of criticism presupposes a comparatively coherent community as the fundamental fond fabric of moral systems and ethical point of view. As in contemporary society the primary communal realism of values has been devastated, there can be no clear position of hierarchical values so as to found a critique of mass culture. In any case, the significance of postmodernist cultural pluralism is to weaken the basis for the privileged asserts high culture to be the standard of aesthetic preeminence. Therefore, the spark advance metaphor or mode of thought in modern scathing theory is inevitably reflective, since critical evaluation should be retrospective. The foundationalist and dualist philosophical endeavor that under girds the social order should be abandoned, so that utility(a) ideas can be amuses. In this regard, westbound admits that he has a very strong anti-metaphysical bent (West, 1993b 51). law is thus conditional and tied thoroughly to human desires and aims. Truth, as West writes, is the product of reasonable assertions that ar themselves value-laden and commendable of human beings working in cohesion for the common good ( Wes t, 1989 100). In this way, West is anti-metaphysical. Consequently, persons should be made sentient that an all surrounding common culture is not a prerequisite for securing quick and harmonious race relations. As Roland Barthes is fond of saying, postmodernists consider persons to be open signifiers (Barthes, 1977). Undeniably, writers such as buzzer hooks, Paul Gilroy, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., Cornel West, and Manning Marable--prominent writers in the field of race relations concur that the analysis of essentialism offered by postmodernists is dominant to establishing an democratic society. This does not mean, though, that all the writers such as Paul Gilroy, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., and Cornel West consider themselves to be postmodernists. Indeed, at times, each one condemns postmodernism for a diversity of reasons. But what is clear is that their introductory arguments are consistent with Lyotards understanding of the key thrust of postmodernism astonishment toward meta-narrati ves ( Lyotard, 1984 xxiv). The consequence of this attack on absolutes is that the racial ontology offered by assimilationists is no lifelong workable. Certainly, the uneven social relationships continued by minorities based on disparities in biological, cultural, or genetic aspects, which have put in to enriching particular cultures over others, can no longer be